Event: 2011 IAFE Annual Conference
Date: May 16-17th, 2011
Time: May 16th - Breakout sessions from 3-6:00PM, Reception and Dinner from 6:15-10:00PM AND
May 17th - 8:45AM Registration, Program runs from 9AM - 6:00PM
New York University
60 Washington Square South
New York City
The International Association of Financial Engineers presents
The 2011 IAFE Annual Conference
Financial Facts, Fantasies and Fallacies?
May 16-17th, 2011
New York University
60 Washington Square South
New York City
For the first time in many years the IAFE Annual Conference has been expanded to a 2 day conference including a Dinner, a reception and multiple seminar tracks. Now in its 19th year, the IAFE Annual Conference attracts approximately 250 senior and mid level practitioners from the banking, asset management, risk management, derivatives, structured finance, insurance, institutional investor, legal, and alternative investment communities.
May 16th, 2011
Concurrent Breakout Sessions & Workshops
Topics in Financial Engineering
Investor Risk Committee & Liquidity Risk Committee Hosts
How to Address the Systemic Part of Liquidity Risk—the Final (?) Frontier
Laura Kodres, Assistant Director and Division Chief, Global Financial Stability Division, IMF
Systemic liquidity risk was at the heart of the recent crisis—funding markets for financial institutions dried up and central banks had to intervene in unprecedented amounts using untried methods. More needs to be done to develop macroprudential techniques to measure and mitigate systemic liquidity risks and some IMF staff have come up with some initial thoughts about how to do this. But such a targeted macroprudential tool presupposes a robust methodology for measuring systemic liquidity risk and an institution’s contribution to this risk on which to base it. We consider three different approaches to measuring systemic liquidity risk and devise associated macroprudential tools to mitigate it.
Liquidity Risk Committee Track Hosts
Technical Agenda for Liquidity Risk Management Systems
Alan King, Research IBM
The most frightening phase of the Financial Crisis of 2007-8 began with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. During the week that followed, the solvency of the prime brokers at the heart of the US Banking System came into question. The two-year long decline in the quality of MBS-related securities widely used as collateral in transactions had undermined the liquidity of the financial system to the point where the core transaction systems were threatened. There has been much discussion of the early warning signs of the liquidity crisis. But data and models needed to support effective action were then and are still sorely lacking. In this talk, we will discuss a technical agenda that addresses some of the challenges in developing liquidity risk management solutions.
Securitization Risk Retention Rules: Panacea or Punishment
Andrew Davidson, President, Andy Davidson & Company & IAFE Advisory Board Member
David Schwartz, Managing Director, Financial Engineering, Duff & Phelps
Proposed rules for risk retention could serve to better align incentives or lead to the creation of of "retention avoidance" strategies. Either way, there will be great opportunities for creative financial engineers.
Credit Risk Committee Hosts
Counterparty Credit Risk Modeling Workshop
Dan Rosen, CEO and Co-Founder,R2 Financial Technologies
David Saunders, Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo
Eduardo Canabarro, Managing Director & Global Head of the Quantitative Risk Groups, Morgan Stanley
The recent financial crisis has highlighted the need for the industry to understand the complexity and interconnectedness of the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and to develop better approaches for accurately measuring, managing and mitigating Counterparty Credit Risk (CCR). In particular, the Basel Committee identified several areas where capital for CCR proved to be inadequate, and has revamped its treatment in Basel III. For instance, wrong-way risk was evident through the crisis and was not adequately incorporated into the framework. Second, mark-to-market losses due to credit valuation adjustments (CVA) were not directly capitalized, with roughly two-thirds of CCR losses due to CVA. Also, large financial institutions were more interconnected than previously modeled. Finally, Central Counterparties were not widely used to clear trades. This workshop discusses the evolution of CCR measurement, the latest techniques available to practitioners, as well as some of the key issue and challenges to implement an effective CCR program in the aftermath of the crisis and in the context of new Basel III regulation.
IAFE Annual Conference Reception and Dinner
Jane Restaurant, 100 West Houston Street, New York
Featuring Nobel Laureate & IAFE Senior Fellow
Robert Merton as Dinner Speaker
“Observations of a Financial Engineer on Retirement Finance”
Dinner Sponsored by:
May 17th, 2011
Coffee & Light Breakfast
IAFE Annual General Membership Meeting
Richard Lindsey, Principal, Callcott Group and IAFE Chairman
The Impact of the AXA/Rosenberg/SEC Model Risk Settlement on Quant Funds
Giovanni Beliossi, Managing Partner & CEO, FGS Capital LLP & IAFE Board Member
Bradley Bondi, Partner, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
Barry Schachter, Chief Risk Officer, Woodbine Capital Advisors LP & IAFE Advisory Board Member
Peter Niculescu, Partner, Capital Market Risk Advisors
In the wake of the AXA Rosenberg/SEC Model Risk settlement (http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-37.htm), model risk is an important issue not only for quant funds but for all financial institutions. The result of the SEC settlement may be the formulation of new rules governing model disclosure and oversight. Financial institutions often do not review models used for investing or hedging to the same rigorous standards as models used in financial statements or disclosures. One possible result of the SEC settlement could be the application of much greater review and oversight requirements on investment and hedging models.
Liquidity Risk and High Frequency Trading
Peter Kyle, Charles E. Smith Chair Professor of Finance, University of Maryland
Ross Garon, Managing Director, Quantitative Strategies, S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.
Roy Henriksson, Chief Investment Officer, Advanced Portfolio Management and IAFE Risk Co-Chair
In the aftermath of the Flash Crash of May 6, 2010, the structure of the U.S. financial markets and their potential fragility have come under heightened scrutiny from regulators, policy makers, and market participants. Much of the focus has been on the role and function of algorithmic and high frequency trading in the impacted markets. This panel will examine how high frequency and algorithmic trading may have impacted the way markets operate, the pros and cons of high frequency trading with respect to market liquidity, and whether high frequency trading has or could be the primary cause of liquidity shocks in the financial system?
Lunch Sponsored by UC Berkeley MFE
Keynote Speech: Financial Facts, Fantasies and Fallacies?
Peter Carr, Managing Director and Global Head of Market Modeling, Morgan Stanley, and 2010 IAFE/SunGard Financial Engineer of the Year
Risk Appetite and Attitude
Mike Alix, SVP, Risk Management, Financial Institutions Supervision Group, New York Federal Reserve Bank
Tom Woods, Senior Executive VP and CRO, CIBC
Eric Reiner, Managing Director, Firm-wide Risk Control and Methodology, UBS AG
Lesley Daniels Webster, Principal, Daniels Webster Capital Advisors and retired Head of Market Risk at JPM
Establishing, articulating, communicating, and measuring the level of risk that is acceptable to a firm has become an area of keen interest to regulators and Boards. Best Practice has evolved from quantification of metrics to communication of “Risk Attitude” i.e. limit governance , attitude towards complexity, “hard to value” etc. Establishing a risk appetite includes the formulation of multiple risk metrics including VaR, stress testing and other metrics designed to measure Black Swan-type risks that need to be calculated.
Lawyers and Practitioners Exchange Views on Swaps Clearing, Lehman Flip Clauses/Bid-Offers and Other Topics of Mutual Interest
Neil Binder, Partner, Richards Kibbe & Orbe, LLP
Joshua Cohn, Partner, Mayer Brown LLP
Guy Dempsey, Partner, Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP
Michael S. Etkin, Member, Lowenstein Sandler PC
Eric Moser, Partner, Alternative Investments Practice, Milbank
Don Thompson, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, JPMorgan Chase
Richard Lindsey, Principal, Callcott Group & IAFE Chairman & former Director of Market Regulation for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
The financial crisis has spawned a tremendous uptick in financial engineering litigation and the Dodd-Frank Bill is poised to have a significant impact on OTC derivatives and structured finance. The panel will explore topics of mutual interest to practitioners and lawyers from “How will the clearing of swaps resolve the bid/offer spread debates between counterparties and the next Lehman?” to “Flip clauses-what will be the impact on the structured finance industry if Metavante is not overturned?"
(This Session Has Been Submitted for CLE Credits, they will be distributed pending approval)
Wine and Cheese Reception
Registration has closed for this event